Assessing emotional intelligence: Reliability and validity of the Bar-On Emotional Quotient Inventory (1997 2000) in university students. European Journal of Personality, 19(6), 519-536.ĭawda, D. Predicting psychological health: Assessing the incremental validity of emotional intelligence beyond personality, Type A behaviour, and daily hassles. Journal of Management in Engineering, 22(3), 119-125.ĭay, A. Emotional intelligence and leadership behavior in construction executives. The Bar-On model of emotional-social intelligence (ESI). Geher (Ed.), Measuring emotional intelligence: Common ground and controversy.
The Bar-On Emotional Quotient Inventory (EQ-i): Rationale, description and psychometric properties. Bar-On's website for additional information EQ-i 2.0 and EQ 360 Composite Scales and Subscales Self-Perception:īar-On, R. However, inclusion of a test on this web site does not constitute an endorsement of that test by CREIO.Īdministration: Self Report and Mulit-rater As a service to our visitors, we have reviewed many of these tests and selected those for which there is a substantial body of research (at least five published journal articles or book chapters that provide empirical data based on the test). Some of these tests seem promising, but many have not been empirically evaluated. Many tests that promise to measure emotional intelligence have appeared in recent years. Both assessments measure emotional intelligence (EI) using one total score, five composite scores and 15 specific subcale scores. When observer ratings are compared with the results of an EQ-i 2.0 self-report a more detailed profile emerges. The EQ 360 assessment provides a more in-depth analysis by having those who work with the person being assesed provide information as well. The EQ-i 2.0 is a self-report measure designed to measure a number of constructs related to EI. The Emotional Quotient Inventory 2.0 (EQ-i 2.0) and the EQ-360 were developed to assess the Bar-On model of emotional-social intelligence.
0 kommentar(er)
